Quantum Computers Pose Existential Threat to Bitcoin—Here’s Why It Matters in 2025

Quantum computing just flipped the script on crypto's golden child. Bitcoin's bulletproof encryption? Suddenly looking rusty against qubits that crack codes like walnuts.

The Looming Quantum Breakthrough

Lab-grown qubits now maintain coherence for minutes—not microseconds. That's lifetimes in computational terms. Enough to brute-force SHA-256? Possibly. Enough to panic HODLers? Absolutely.

Miners Meet Their Match

Imagine quantum rigs solving blocks before ASICs finish their coffee. The entire proof-of-work economy could unravel faster than a leveraged trader's portfolio during a flash crash.

The Silver Lining Playbook

Crypto's already adapting—post-quantum cryptography forks are in dev, because nothing motivates like existential threats (and billionaire VCs protecting their bags).

Final Thought: If Bitcoin survives this, it'll be its greatest HODL story yet. If not? Well, Wall Street's quant shops always wanted a piece of the action—just not like this.

$101,508. A newly published report details the current state of quantum computers, the threats they pose to Bitcoin, and possible strategies to address these concerns. The report emphasizes the importance of timely interventions in minimizing the risks that the Bitcoin ecosystem might face in the coming years.

ContentsDual Strategy for Quantum PreparednessThreats Posed by Quantum Computers to BitcoinChallenges and Philosophical Debates in the Transition Process

Dual Strategy for Quantum Preparedness

To enhance Bitcoin’s resilience against quantum computers, a two-phase action plan is proposed. The first approach outlines a long-term and comprehensive adaptation process, expected to span approximately seven years. The second approach is designed for a swift response in case of a quantum computing breakthrough, involving emergency measures that can be implemented within two years. In both scenarios, funds managed with caution and without address repetition are considered relatively SAFE for now, yet additional infrastructure will be necessary for long-term protection.

The report mentions the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) recommendation to phase out classical encryption methods by 2030 and switch all systems to post-quantum algorithms by 2035. Similar initiatives are being pursued in the European Union, China, and the United Kingdom, with major tech companies initiating the transition with hybrid cryptography systems.

Threats Posed by Quantum Computers to Bitcoin

The study identifies two main threats posed by quantum computers to Bitcoin: mining and transaction signing. In mining, actors with large-scale centralized quantum hardware could gain an advantage, increasing the risk of centralization. Furthermore, commonly used signature algorithms such as ECDSA could become vulnerable to quantum attacks, allowing attackers to derive private keys from public keys and seize funds.

Approximately 6.51 million bitcoins (or 32.7% of the current supply) associated with certain types of addresses that reuse addresses are currently considered vulnerable and carrying potentially high financial risk. Funds in some address types become more exposed to attacks as their public keys permanently appear on the blockchain when spent.

Challenges and Philosophical Debates in the Transition Process

Research on post-quantum secure signature algorithms has been ongoing for years, with protocols like SPHINCS+ and FALCON standing out. However, the significant size of keys and signatures linked to these methods, along with extended verification times, pose performance issues. Also, these systems have yet to provide all capabilities offered by current algorithms, especially limiting applications like the Lightning Network.

Various strategies are being discussed concerning address-specific solutions and migrating UTXOs to quantum-secure formats. This process may involve changes to blockchain rules, such as soft forks. The comprehensive transition is expected to entail technical and practical challenges.

An inherent dilemma arises within Bitcoin’s Core philosophy. The community must decide whether to burn funds at risk from quantum threats or allow them to fall into the hands of quantum-computer-equipped entities. This decision could have significant consequences related to Bitcoin’s principles of user sovereignty and censorship resistance.

The bitcoin ecosystem is advised to increase awareness in the short term regarding issues such as avoiding address reuse and managing public keys on the blockchain. Experts stress the necessity of closely monitoring developments and taking proactive measures until post-quantum encryption standards mature and become widespread globally.

Though the report suggests that the risks are unlikely to materialize soon, it recommends swift and deliberate action to ensure Bitcoin’s long-term security. The preparation process for quantum computers, involving technical, economic, and philosophical dimensions, can be shaped through community participation and transparent decision-making practices. To enhance the security of their addresses and funds, Bitcoin owners are encouraged to avoid address reuse and stay updated with new security standard applications during this transition.

You can follow our news on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter & Coinmarketcap Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.