Tapzi vs. Telegram Mini-Games: Why This Web3 Presale Project Could Be TON’s Next Big Rival in 2025
- Why Tapzi’s Web3 Model Poses a Threat to Telegram’s Dominance
- TON vs. Tapzi: The Tech Behind the Rivalry
- 2025 Presale Frenzy: Why Investors Are Betting on Tapzi
- FAQ: Your Tapzi vs. Telegram Questions Answered
Move over, Telegram—Tapzi is gunning for the throne. As Web3 gaming heats up in 2025, Tapzi’s presale project is emerging as a dark horse against The Open Network (TON). With Telegram’s mini-games dominating casual crypto gaming, Tapzi’s play-to-earn mechanics and decentralized ecosystem are turning heads. Could this be the year the underdog flips the script? Let’s break it down. ---
Why Tapzi’s Web3 Model Poses a Threat to Telegram’s Dominance
Telegram’s mini-games have been the go-to for lightweight crypto entertainment, but Tapzi’s presale project is rewriting the rules. Unlike Telegram’s centralized approach, Tapzi leverages blockchain for true asset ownership—think NFTs as in-game items tradable on BTCC or other exchanges. Data from CoinMarketCap shows Web3 gaming tokens surged 120% in Q2 2025, signaling a market ripe for disruption.
Take “CryptoDynasty,” Tapzi’s flagship game. Players earn $TZP tokens by completing quests, which can be staked or swapped. Compare that to Telegram’s “Hamster Kombat,” where rewards rarely leave the app. “Tapzi bridges the gap between fun and utility,” notes a BTCC analyst. “It’s Axie Infinity meets Telegram—but with lower fees thanks to its Layer-2 solution.”
TON vs. Tapzi: The Tech Behind the Rivalry
TON’s strength lies in Telegram’s 800M-user ecosystem, but Tapzi’s modular blockchain targets scalability. While TON processes ~100K TPS, Tapzi’s testnet hit 250K TPS by using zk-rollups—a stat flaunted in their June 2025 whitepaper. However, TON’s brand recognition isn’t easily dismissed. “It’s like comparing Spotify to a startup music platform,” admits a developer on X. “But startups sometimes nail the features giants overlook.”
Key differences:
- Tokenomics: Tapzi’s deflationary $TZP burns 5% of fees, while TON’s inflationary model faces criticism.
- Accessibility: Telegram games require zero crypto knowledge; Tapzi demands wallets but offers onboarding tutorials.
2025 Presale Frenzy: Why Investors Are Betting on Tapzi
Tapzi’s presale sold out in 12 hours, raising $35M—a record for Web3 gaming projects this year. Early backers cite its “Netflix-for-games” subscription model, where $TZP holders access exclusive titles. Meanwhile, TON’s gaming arm relies on third-party devs. “Tapzi controls quality; Telegram’s store is hit-or-miss,” argues Reddit user u/CryptoPirate2025.
Risks? Sure. Tapzi’s roadmap delays its metaverse integration to Q4 2025, and regulatory scrutiny looms. But with airdrops teased for presale participants, FOMO is real. As of August 2025, $TZP trades at $0.18, up 300% from its presale price (per TradingView).
---FAQ: Your Tapzi vs. Telegram Questions Answered
Is Tapzi’s presale still open?
No—the 2025 presale concluded in July. Secondary trading is live on BTCC and KuCoin.
Can Telegram mini-games integrate Web3?
Technically yes, but Telegram’s partnership with TON limits third-party blockchain features.
Which platform is cheaper for gamers?
Telegram games are free; Tapzi requires an initial $TZP purchase (~$5 worth) to start earning.
