Bitcoin Core Devs Launch Coordinated Attack — Here’s Their Strategic Target
Bitcoin's development elite are mounting a coordinated offensive against the network's most pressing vulnerability.
The Target: Scalability bottlenecks that have plagued Bitcoin since its inception. Core developers are deploying a multi-pronged assault on transaction throughput limitations, aiming to finally achieve the network's promised potential as global digital gold.
Technical Siege Underway: Implementation of Schnorr signatures and Taproot upgrades are just the opening salvos. The development community is now converging on layer-2 solutions and sidechain integrations that could potentially multiply Bitcoin's transaction capacity by orders of magnitude.
Market Implications: While traders obsess over short-term price movements, the real action happens in GitHub repositories. These technical battles determine whether Bitcoin remains digital gold or becomes digital lead—because in crypto, even the most revolutionary technology can't escape the fact that sometimes the most coordinated attack comes from your own developers deciding to 'improve' things.
Bitcoin Knots Nodes Face Attack By Core Devs
Luke Dashjr, Core developer and CTO of Ocean Mining has raised alarms on X social media, warning users to take extra precautions as bad actors were targeting individual Knot nodes. Dashjr shared a video showing bitcoin core devs admitting to an attack on Knot nodes.
The CTO highlighted the risk of bandwidth exhaustion, advising users to configure their “maxuploadtarget” setting to mitigate damage from the alleged attack. This warning came amid a growing storm of reports that Knots operators were overwhelmed with repeated Initial Block Download (IBD) requests—an exploit that forces nodes into a loop of data-heavy syncing.
Anton, a BTC miner at Ocean, shared insights on the video shared by Dashjr, stating that it showed Bitcoin Core developers laughing almost hysterically about the alleged attacks. The footage featured ‘PortlandHODL,’ creator of Marathon’s Slipstream—a transaction-relay service tied to the MARA Bitcoin mining pool—bragging about abusing bandwidth-limited Knots nodes.
According to Anton, this was not just trolling but a calculated sabotage attempt designed to discredit Knots and its users. He urged Bitcoiners to push back against what he described as “malicious actors with zero concern about consequences” and to support Ocean pool and Knots instead to preserve Bitcoin’s integrity.
Consequently, the backlash was swift, with various crypto community members criticizing the core developers for the alleged attack. A pseudonymous figure, ClioBitcoinBanks.sats, admitted on X to scripting automated IBD requests against multiple Knots nodes, even boasting about disguising them as fresh installs. He framed the act not as an attack but as “defensive return fire” aimed at humiliating Knot operators.
BitcoinMonk, a miner and Knots runner, condemned the CORE developers allegedly involved in the attack. He accused PortlandHODL and his peers of openly mocking pleb node operators while destabilizing the Bitcoin network. To him, the attacks were evidence of a deeper agenda to weaken BTC’s monetary properties and push for adopting “malware” updates in Core v30.
Knots Attack Denied Amid FBI Involvement
As discontent mounted, some crypto community members escalated the matter further by tagging federal authorities. One user argued that DOS attacks are illegal under US law and urged the FBI to investigate individuals such as PortlandHODL for orchestrating the IBD floods.
Interestingly, the narrative took an unexpected twist when one of PortlandHODL’s peers, known as ‘Wicked’ on X, dismissed the accusations entirely. In his view, the creator of Slipstream had never attacked at all. Instead, Wicked suggested the entire scandal was an elaborate act of “trolling” that successfully baited Knots supporters into outrage.
According to him, the supposed “attack” was nothing more than banter, and the overreaction—including calls to involve the FBI—only underscored how easily the other side could be provoked.
