BTCC / BTCC Square / Bitcoinist /
Ethereum Treasuries Crisis: 65% of Firms Sink Below mNAV - Can ETH Survive the Storm?

Ethereum Treasuries Crisis: 65% of Firms Sink Below mNAV - Can ETH Survive the Storm?

Author:
Bitcoinist
Published:
2025-11-17 22:00:33
13
3

The Ethereum ecosystem is flashing red as nearly two-thirds of treasury-holding projects now trade below their minimum net asset value. Institutional holders are sweating their collateral positions while retail traders scramble for exits.

Market analysts point to cascading liquidations in DeFi protocols as the primary pressure point. 'When ETH staking yields can't cover treasury shortfalls, you get this bloodbath,' remarked one hedge fund manager between sips of a $22 artisanal latte.

The crisis exposes the dirty secret of crypto treasuries: paper gains vanish faster than a VC's promises during bear markets. With ETH hovering near critical support levels, the next 48 hours could determine whether this is a fire sale - or a funeral.

Ethereum Treasury Firms Are Looking Unhealthy

In a new thread on X, Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards has discussed some metrics related to Ethereum treasury companies. A treasury firm refers to a public corporation that has adopted a digital asset like Bitcoin or Ethereum as its reserve strategy.

The idea was popularized by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), which pivoted to being a BTC treasury firm back in 2020. Since then, the company has grown into by far the largest corporate digital asset holder, with a whopping $47.54 billion invested.

Earlier, companies were looking at only the number one cryptocurrency as a viable reserve asset, but this year, there has been a rise in holders of ETH, the coin ranked just behind BTC.

The Ethereum treasury frenzy peaked in August, but since then, the growth rate attached to them has witnessed a slowdown, as the chart below shared by Edwards shows.

Ethereum Treasury Buying

From the graph, it’s clear that the rate of change for Ethereum treasuries is positive even after the slowdown, suggesting that companies remain in net accumulation. This has meant that, despite the outflows that the spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have witnessed recently, institutional buying still remains above the cryptocurrency’s supply growth, although only just.

While corporate accumulation continues, the ETH treasury business model may not be working for a lot of the firms. As the analyst has pointed out, the majority of companies have an mNAV value less than 1.

Ethereum Treasury mNAV

mNAV, standing for Multiple of Net Asset Value, is a metric that compares the market cap of a treasury firm against the total value of its reserve assets. The indicator being below the 1 mark naturally implies the firm’s valuation is less than its treasury’s worth.

About 64.3% of all Ethereum treasury firms currently fall into this zone. “That means the treasury company picture is a lot more unhealthy for ETH than Bitcoin,” explained Edwards.

Clearly, ETH treasuries are coming under pressure, so are any of them reacting by selling? Data suggests not many, as the net buy/sell ratio related to them still remains strong.

Ethereum Treasury Buy/Sell Ratio

That said, while almost all Ethereum corporate holders are still net buyers, the buy/sell ratio has started to show a decline as the asset’s price has experienced its recent bearish shift.

ETH Price

Ethereum plunged toward $3,000 on Sunday, but the coin has since seen a small jump back to $3,200.

Ethereum Price Chart

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.