Bybit Faces Fire for Botched PUMP Token Sale—Crypto Community Erupts

Crypto exchange Bybit just stepped on a rake—and the handle hit them square in the face. Their latest token sale for PUMP, a memecoin project, spiraled into chaos as users reported frozen funds, glitchy interfaces, and the classic 'we’re-working-on-it' tweets.

When exchanges play pump-and-dump dress-up

Angry traders flooded social media with screenshots of failed transactions, while PUMP’s price chart resembled a heart attack. Some blamed bot congestion; others smelled the distinct aroma of yet another 'technical difficulty' cover story.

Bonus jab: Nothing says 'decentralized future' like centralized platforms tripping over their own token launches—bankers are taking notes, and not in a good way.

Bybit Under Fire Amid User Frustration

Despite being unavailable to users in the US and UK, the token sale attracted massive interest. Based on this, the PUMP token sale sold out in just 12 minutes. It raised $500 million and saw a 40% price surge in the following hours.

However, beneath the surface, frustration and accusations began to mount. Some users reported failed transactions, frozen funds, and what they claim was an unfair and opaque allocation process.

you guys got some explaining to do to prove no crime was committed.https://t.co/QYrsjHlMwb

Bybit Exchange’s handling of the sale quickly came under fire following a wave of user complaints across X (formerly Twitter). In an official statement, Bybit said the sale was “oversubscribed due to an unexpected API delay.”

Resultantly, some users received allocations while others got refunds or were left with funds stuck in limbo.

“We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused and appreciate the patience and continued support of our community,” Bybit wrote.

Notwithstanding, the apology did not go far enough for many in the crypto community. Some users slammed Bybit for delayed communication. They compared Bybit’s responsiveness to how the exchange handled the landmark $1.5 billion hack in February.

Are they the same people who were goated with their communication during the bybit ETH hack ?pic.twitter.com/QK5kabAiFt

Several users shared video evidence showing that they placed their orders within the first seconds of the sale going live, yet were still refunded. Meanwhile, others who seemingly ordered later received their tokens.

Against this backdrop, users demand a detailed, timestamped audit of transactions to prove fairness.

You guys are better than this at comms.

Just put out a time stamp down to the second

"All orders before x will be processed"

The harshest criticism came from crypto commentator Abhi (@0xAbhiP), who accused both Bybit and Pump.fun of potentially illegal conduct.

“Be Bybit & Pump.fun running $PUMP presale > users buy within seconds > sudden ‘API delay’ > refunds hit randomly > legit early orders ignored, funds stuck > zero transparency, chaotic comms > CT furious, trust gone permanently,” Abhi posted. “Shame on Pump and Bybit for rugging users,” the crypto founder remarked.

Some call it a “centralized rug,” with users withdrawing funds, deleting apps, and vowing never to use the platform again.

Was the Incident An Engineered Scarcity?

Some traders call a masterclass in engineered scarcity elsewhere, noting that Bybit and Pump.fun kept everyone in the dark.

“Fake scarcity achieved. Shortsqueeze.exe,” Mosi quipped.

According to Mosi, a popular user on X, Bybit, and Pump.fun did not disclose what percentage of the token supply WOULD be allocated to each venue on-chain or centralized.

The user cites delta-neutral funds shorting around the $5 billion valuation mark to arbitrage the spot-perps price gap, expecting to buy spot tokens on Bybit to hedge.

However, when few allocations were filled on the exchange, these sophisticated players were forced to cover shorts into rising prices even for early participants. This caused demand to shift to perpetuals because the token was not immediately tradable.

This Hyperliquid trader deposited $8,000,000 and began shorting $PUMP

He's already down $1,000,000+

Squeeze the hedgoooooors pic.twitter.com/jIUeH6g27h

On-chain buyers received smooth fills while exchange participants, including institutional traders, were sidelined.

The illusion of scarcity was maintained, and the price was squeezed upward, all while chaos unfolded on social media.

deposited 2mil to bybit, sent all of it to the pump ico

insta hedged it all locking in the free money

now bybit tells my i didnt fill and im down 30% on the hedge

oh and they locked my money

gg pic.twitter.com/Xn0dwtTh2P

However, not everyone was against the platform. While critics slammed the PUMP token sale as extractive and unfair, others pushed back. Analyst and crypto influencer Ran Neuner argued that the project’s vision is being overlooked.

The influencer lauded Pump.fun for being one of the few successful crypto apps not raising funds to build another app chain.

Instead, it is using funds to build a meme-powered social network that directly competes with Meta and TikTok while letting users monetize memes from day one.

I see so many tweets about $PUMP being extractive.

– the token was sold at 2x cash after the raise.

– they are one of the first success apps that is not raising money to start their own app chain. They are focussed on the real task of creating the social network.
– they are…

The incident reflects a growing tension between centralized exchanges (CEXs) and the fast-paced meme coin sector.

While CEXs provide structure and access, community expectations around transparency and fairness remain high, especially in the speculative meme coin space.

do you know anyone who managed to APE $pump on bybit?

know a lot of guy who aped first 3 seconds who are not in, looks criminal…

For Bybit, this episode suggests that even when a token sale is technically successful, perception is everything, and when retail trust is lost, no price pump can fix the damage.