JPMorgan’s Alleged Short Position Debunked: Viral Claim Collapses as Documents Reveal No Bearish Bets
- How Did the JPMorgan Short Narrative Fall Apart?
- Why Did Options Activity Fuel Misinterpretation?
- What Did Institutions Really Do With Bitcoin Exposure?
- How Does Regulation SHO Prevent Hidden Shorts?
- What Lessons Emerge From the False Squeeze Hype?
- *
In a twist that exposed the dangers of financial misinformation, viral claims that JPMorgan was shorting a major asset crumbled under scrutiny. SEC filings revealed the bank held no short positions, sparking debates about market manipulation narratives. Meanwhile, institutional giants like Harvard and Abu Dhabi’s Al Warda quietly doubled down on bitcoin ETFs, overshadowing the drama with billion-dollar moves.
How Did the JPMorgan Short Narrative Fall Apart?
The rumor mill went into overdrive in November 2025 when social media traders claimed JPMorgan had taken massive short positions against MicroStrategy (MSTR). Calls for a retaliatory buying spree echoed the GameStop saga, with finfluencers predicting an imminent short squeeze. But the 13F-HR filing told a different story – JPMorgan’s actual position showed a 24.54% reduction in MSTR shares (selling 772,453 stocks) alongside options activity. The bank held $65M in calls and $117M in puts, the latter representing just 0.00254% of its $4.6T assets under management – standard hedging for a firm this size.
Why Did Options Activity Fuel Misinterpretation?
Put options became the smoking gun for conspiracy theorists, despite fundamental differences from short selling. Unlike unlimited-loss short positions, puts cap risk at the premium paid. FINRA data showed MicroStrategy’s short interest at 9.74% of float (25.28M shares) – far from GameStop’s 140% peak. The float size also mattered: MSTR’s 259M circulating shares made retail-driven pumps harder versus GameStop’s 70M. "This was a classic case of confirmation bias," noted a BTCC market analyst. "Traders saw what they wanted in complex instruments."
What Did Institutions Really Do With Bitcoin Exposure?
While the short-selling drama dominated headlines, institutional moves told a richer story:
- Harvard University boosted iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) holdings by 257% to $442.8M – now its largest equity position
- Al Warda Investments (Abu Dhabi-backed) increased IBIT exposure by 230% to $517.6M
- Emory University grew Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust holdings by 91% to $42.9M
Spot Bitcoin ETFs have absorbed $60.8B inflows since January 2024 approval, per CoinMarketCap data. This institutional accumulation phase contrasts sharply with retail’s focus on short-squeeze fantasies.
How Does Regulation SHO Prevent Hidden Shorts?
The SEC’s Regulation SHO mandates disclosure when short interest exceeds 5% of shares outstanding, requiring Form 13D/13G filings. JPMorgan’s 13F showed no such activity, yet the narrative persisted for weeks. "Social media conflates hedging with directional bets," said a TradingView strategist. "A bank JPMorgan’s size manages risk across correlated assets – those puts could hedge anything from tech stocks to crypto miners."
What Lessons Emerge From the False Squeeze Hype?
The episode highlights three critical gaps in retail trading psychology:
- Document literacy: 13F filings exclude short positions entirely, yet became "proof" of nonexistent bets
- Scale blindness: $117M in puts seems huge until contextualized against $4.6T AUM
- Narrative addiction: The GameStop template overrode actual SEC disclosures
Meanwhile, institutions kept accumulating Bitcoin exposure with minimal fanfare – perhaps the real story all along.
*
Did JPMorgan actually short MicroStrategy?
No. SEC FORM 13F-HR filings confirmed JPMorgan held zero short positions in MSTR as of Q3 2025. The bank reduced long holdings by 24.54% while maintaining standard options hedges.
How significant were JPMorgan’s put options?
The $117M in puts represented just 0.00254% of assets under management – a rounding error for a $4.6T institution. This aligns with typical portfolio insurance strategies.
Which institutions increased Bitcoin ETF stakes?
Harvard, Abu Dhabi’s Al Warda Investments, and Emory University significantly expanded positions in IBIT and Grayscale’s Bitcoin trust during the same quarter.
Could MicroStrategy have faced a GameStop-style squeeze?
Unlikely. With short interest at 9.74% of float (vs. GameStop’s 140%) and 259M shares outstanding, the structural conditions differed radically.
