Is wood overzealous about institutional adoption of bitcoin?
In recent discussions surrounding the integration of Bitcoin into traditional financial institutions, there has been a notable figurehead, let's call him "Wood," who has been particularly vocal about the need for widespread institutional adoption. However, one must ask, is Wood perhaps overzealous in his advocacy? While the potential benefits of Bitcoin for institutions are undeniable, including increased liquidity, reduced transaction costs, and access to a global market, there are also significant risks that cannot be overlooked. From volatility to regulatory uncertainty, institutions face a unique set of challenges in adopting Bitcoin. So, is Wood's enthusiasm for institutional adoption of Bitcoin justified, or is he perhaps overlooking the potential downsides in his eagerness to promote this emerging technology?