Are ail agents captive?

Are all agents truly captive to their clients' demands and interests, or do they possess a level of autonomy and objectivity in their decision-making processes? In the realm of finance and cryptocurrency, where the stakes are high and the potential for conflict of interest is ever-present, it's crucial to examine the role of agents and their ability to act in the best interests of their clients. For instance, are brokers and advisors in the cryptocurrency space solely focused on maximizing profits for their clients, or do they also consider the long-term impact of their recommendations on the overall market? Do they prioritize their own interests over those of their clients, or do they strive to maintain a balance of objectivity and transparency? Moreover, what measures are in place to ensure that agents are not unduly influenced by external factors, such as personal relationships or financial incentives? And how can investors protect themselves from potential conflicts of interest, ensuring that their agents are truly captive to their own best interests? These are important questions to consider, as the answers can have significant implications for the health and stability of the cryptocurrency market, as well as the financial well-being of individual investors.