Is MetaMask safer than Coinbase?

In the realm of cryptocurrency and digital wallets, safety is often a paramount concern for investors and enthusiasts alike. Given the rise in popularity of both MetaMask and Coinbase, a common query arises: which one is safer? MetaMask, as a non-custodial wallet, empowers users with full control over their private keys, theoretically making it more secure from external breaches. However, this also means users are solely responsible for safeguarding their keys, which can be a double-edged sword. Coinbase, on the other hand, operates as a custodial platform, meaning the company stores user funds securely in their vaults, mitigating some security risks. But, this centralized approach has its own set of challenges, such as potential hacks or breaches on the platform itself. So, the question begs: Is MetaMask's autonomy and individual responsibility truly safer than Coinbase's custodial approach? It's a nuanced debate that merits a careful analysis of each platform's security features, practices, and vulnerabilities.