Is return to Arkham better?

In the realm of cryptocurrency and finance, the debate surrounding the question "Is return to Arkham better?" often revolves around the assessment of various strategies and approaches. Arkham, in this context, could represent a previous state, a baseline, or a set of circumstances that an investor or analyst is considering revisiting. The questioner's tone might reflect a desire for clarity, a search for validation, or perhaps an acknowledgment of uncertainty. A simulated description of the questioner's tone might sound like this: "In the volatile world of cryptocurrencies and financial markets, we are often faced with decisions that require a careful balancing of risks and rewards. As I weigh the options before me, I find myself wondering: is it truly wiser to return to Arkham? By Arkham, I mean the familiar strategies, the known risks, or perhaps the simpler times before the complexities of today's markets. Am I overlooking something critical in my quest for stability, or is this indeed the path that leads to greater clarity and success? I seek your insights and guidance as I navigate this challenging terrain.